Safari

Review: Safari 4March 20th, 2009

It looks like it’s a time for new browser releases, with Opera, Internet Explorer and now Safari releasing public betas for their next major upgrade within the last few months. Obviously I have to throw in my two cents, don’t I?

The biggest change you’ll notice on start-up is the new tab/url area. The buttons have been given a refresh to make it even nicer, and as with Chrome tabs are now at the top of the window. Those who use the Windows version will also find a skin more like the Windows look and feel. At first I wasn’t so sure about the new tab position (I still don’t see the point), but you do get used to it. Well, I say that, but you now can drag tabs only from the corner to move them around, which I still forget and I end up dragging the entire window around.

The default start page also takes a leaf out of Chrome’s book, with a rather nice ‘wall’ of the most popular sites visited for you to choose from. But with the nice graphics comes slowness, and I’ve found that since the start page actually visits the site, ‘since last visit’ features (such as on messageboards) don’t work so well. So I’ve disabled that particular feature.

One very positive change is the new engines (particularly the javascript engine). Safari 4 is quick. Any delay in loading the page really is only waiting for the server now, which is amazing stuff. I can see a lot of people migrating from Firefox and Chrome because of this, and I think the only thing to stop this is lack of plugin support (but perhaps Safari’s simplicity is a good thing?)

Another amazing change is that Safari uses a recent version of Webkit, which passes Acid3 compliance. This means that HTML and CSS standard compliance is at 100% as far as can be measured; websites look how they are supposed to look according to W3C, not how the browser developers decided they should look.

I’ve seen a few reports on Twitter of people having problems after installing the beta, but I can’t say I’ve had any at all. In fact, I’ve found it smoother than Safari 3. Should you update and try it out? Most certainly, but take a backup first just in case!

External links

Web browsers: a rundownNovember 28th, 2008

With Google entering the web browser market, there’s now more choice for the user than ever before. But most users don’t even realise such a choice exists, and stay with the default choice in their operating system (Internet Explorer). So here’s a rundown of the most popular browsers out there, and what’s so good — and bad — about them.

Internet Explorer 6

This is what you’ll get by default if you have Windows XP. Now eight years old, IE6 is one of the oldest browsers out there. It doesn’t follow standards properly (and doesn’t follow the very latest standards at all) and has many security problems. All IE6 users are urged to upgrade to IE7.

Internet Explorer 7

IE7 comes with Windows Vista, and is the current version of the Microsoft browser. Improvements over IE6 include tab support, better font display, and better security. Although not as good as other browsers, IE7 also supports standards better than IE6.

Internet Explorer 8

Not yet released (it’s in the late stages of public beta), but Internet Explorer 8 is the upcoming version, with a release planned vaguely soon. I’ve been playing around with it this week and I’m very impressed. Improved features include a better address bar, better search bar, and improved crash recovery (so improved, in fact, you barely notice anything’s crashed)

Firefox

The most popular Internet Explorer alternative. Firefox is an open source browser, which means that it’s free to download and use, anyone can contribute to the code, and anybody can create a plugin for the browser.

Safari

Safari is to Mac OS what Internet Explorer is to Windows. That is, it is the default browser for Macs. Built on the very standards-compliant Webkit engine, it’s very quick and very good looking. Safari is now actually available for Windows, but I agree with those who say that it looks slightly out of place: it has the look and feel of a Mac OS application but inside the Windows look and feel operating system, so it does take a little getting used to.

Safari is also the browser included in the iPhone, which means you get the real web, and not a stripped down WAP-enabled where-the-hell-did-all-the-pictures go web.

Opera

Not many people will have heard of Opera, and to be honest, nowadays it’s nothing to phone home about either. Just like Safari, Opera is available for mobile devices, but other than that it’s pretty much “just another browser”.

Google Chrome

The latest entrant to the sardine can known as the web browser market. Chrome uses the same engine as Safari (Webkit) behind the scenes, but with a lot of improvements that many current browsers don’t yet have. These improvements include running tabs as different “processes” which effectively means you have more than one version of chrome running (so it’s better when it crashes), a better address bar which includes suggested search results and previously visited sites, and a default homepage which contains your most visited site.

Chrome is still very new to the market and has little market penetration (current figures range from 1-5%), but some commentators believe that Chrome will eventually do well.

Which one to choose

So, the question to ask now is which one to choose. Well, personally I say nowadays you can’t go very wrong. With the release of IE7, all browsers are at least vaguely standards compliant (which is the main thing) and most browsers are now decent bits of software.

This renewed competition has been a very good thing in recent years, with many developments being made. All of the browsers now have their pros (and, of course, their cons), so my advice to anybody is to try out all the different browsers for a bit and see which one suits you the best. Afterall, there’s no harm in it.