Apple

Review: Apple iPadJune 2nd, 2010

Apple iPad

Photo by johncatral, used under CC licence

It seems that one of the fastest selling items that Apple have made is also one that has split everybody firmly into two camps. Those that think it’s the best thing that Apple have ever done, and those that don’t see the point and think it’s little more than a giant iPod Touch.

Well, it is a giant iPod Touch. But once you get on it it really doesn’t feel like it. I would have preferred a better home screen and some other interface elements don’t quite work well, but it feels right. Every built in application has been reworked, and they all work very well with the extra screen space. Third party applications have yet to perfect this, but it’s to be expected with developers being unable to use a real device to test their application.

Let’s get this out of the way: the iPad is not a laptop replacement. Don’t expect to be able to write more than a few sentences on the keyboard, and don’t expect the iWork apps to be any good. In fact, I don’t think iWork should be on the iPad at all: I found all of the apps either hard or impossible to use, and I don’t see the point in them.

The iPad is for using on the couch, something to use quickly to surf the web or check your email. Something you use to look at your photograph collection — or show off your photograph collection. It quickly turns on, doesn’t need any thought, and does exactly what you need it to do before you put it back in its home — on the coffee table, next to your cup of tea and by the remote control.

The screen really is magic. The multitouch responsiveness is exactly what you expect from Apple, and after two years of using iPhones and iPod Touches it still blew me away. It’s incredibly smooth and quick, and is best experienced in Maps. The pinch to zoom really comes into its own here, and you can get a clear (and large) map which just moves along with your fingertips. I would love to use it for real, I genuinely think it would match both the iPhone and paper maps for finding your way around.

iBooks is a fantastic entrance into the eBook reader market. Although I still love the real thing, I like the idea of electronic books. But there just isn’t a reader that cuts it. They’re all slow and cumbersome to use, mainly because they use electronic ink. Well, electronic ink is a dud technology, at least until the next generation starts to appear commercially. At the moment a regular LED backlit display is the best we have. Which isn’t so bad. You swipe across to turn the page, and instantly the page is turned. You can’t get easier to use than that. It’s not perfect, but the iPad is the only device I would truly be happy to use to read eBooks night after night.

Some of the criticisms thrown at the iPad are a little unfair. For a start, its lack of features I don’t care about. I don’t need half a million ports to plug countless devices into it. And I don’t need the ability to read from a USB stick or DVD drive. Nobody ever uses optical discs anymore, and cloud computing is far better than a USB drive. For a start, you can’t lose cloud computing or leave it at home.

And Flash is a rant for another day. I hope iPhone OS never includes it.

But it’s still version 1, and buggy. It didn’t take long for me to confuse the accelerometer and the interfaces aren’t quite there yet. These issues I hope will be fixed in future releases of iPhone OS, and they aren’t enough to stop you from enjoying the device.

The iPad is a first class entrance as both a truly portable computer and ebook reader. It won’t replace your laptop for work, but it might well replace it at home.

Review: iPod nano (5th generation)September 25th, 2009

iPod nano 5th gen

5th gen iPod nano
Photo by mightykenny, used under CC licence

When I first saw Apple’s new iPod nanos, the first thing that came to mind was shiny. Literally. The new finish of the iPod is very shiny, and the colours are very sharp. Year on year the colours get better, and year on year the products are looking even more impressive.

Other than the slightly taller screen, there isn’t much more difference to the overall look of the nano. It seems that Apple have finally settled on a design for this range of iPod, as once more the nano is long and thin, with most of the front containing the screen.

A video camera is the biggest new addition, which appears to be of high quality. Although probably due to the difficulty of fitting a camera behind a screen on such a thin device, it is located at the bottom of the iPod, right where you’d place your fingers when shooting video. As great as it is to have a camera in your iPod, the location is a very bad decision. If you want to use the camera you need to hold the iPod quite awkwardly ensuring your hand covers neither the screen or the lens, and considering the thinness of the thing it’s not an easy thing to do.

I’ve never been a fan of the iPod scroll wheels, and this new nano is no different. I’ve always found them awkward to use and would much rather use a click wheel or touch screen. But this is me, and I’m certain that most other people have no issues at all.

I like the fact that the 5th generation design is similar to the 4th generation design, it works well and provides a nice big screen in relation to the iPod size. I love the new colours but as a whole it’s not for me simply because of the scrollwheel. As a camera, even though it’s good quality again I’m not a fan, the lens position makes for very awkward handling which might make for shaky videos.

Late 2008 MacBook/MacBook ProOctober 24th, 2008

Another new generation of Apple notebooks, another little older my trusty iBook looks and feels. I never thought I could love a laptop more than the previous cute little black MacBooks, but I was wrong. This time the MacBooks don’t look cute — they look stunning. Carrying on with the trend of highly recyclable aluminium and glass, these notebooks look like the portable version of the iMac, which isn’t a bad thing at all.

With a Unibody enclosure which Jony Ive is visibly proud of, this makes both MacBook and MacBook Pro thinner, lighter, and stronger. Rather than sticking parts of aluminium together which could result in failure, why not take one big block of aluminium and machine cut it? Both laptops have large trackpads which is one big button and includes why-didn’t-I-think-of-that four finger gestures, both have even more improved sleep lights and battery indicators which makes my iBook look like an airport runway, and both have a slot which lets you not only easy take out the battery but take out the hard drive as well.

For the geeks out there, the MacBook comes in a 2.0GHz or 2.4GHz variety, both with 2GB of DDR3 RAM. Both come with brand new GeForce 9400M graphics, which I’ve been reliably informed by Mr. Jobs is Very Impressive (and why would he lie?), and will set you back £950 and £1149 respectively. For those without an arm and a leg to spend on literally shiny tech, the old White MacBooks are still available, for a more sensible £719

The MacBook Pro comes in 15- and 17-inch flavours, with speeds of between 2.4 and 2.53GHz. Memory this time is up to 4 GB, and both 15-inch MacBook Pros come with more graphics than you can shake a 3D rendered stick at. At up to £1950, you do need to sell your house in order to afford one, and with the smaller environentally friendly packaging you don’t even get a box to live in.

I won’t be getting one, but I will be very jealous of anybody who does. Once more Apple has made me fall in love with an inanimate object, with some amazing product design. They really need to get rid of those horrible side grills on the MacBook Pro, though. What do you guys think? Are you tempted enough to buy one yourself?